BUT ultimately it comes down to the fact that Revit is the wrong tool for the job. I’ve seen a few folks do it for special situations where, from a design perspective, it made sense to show framing in that level of detail. The add-ons also can't handle edge cases like slanted walls, so I would still need the underlying skillset to know how to build the model myself. I am aware of the existence of plug-ins for Revit that can automatically produce framing layouts for me, but I've reached out to these software companies and there is simply NO way I can afford their products, and no torrents of these Add-ons exist. then the question becomes which CAD/BIM program out there would be better for my use-case?Īny thoughts, discussion, or advice is greatly appreciated. If it's the former, I'm golden, because I can always just. I don't know if the difficulty I'm running into is from a lack of experience with Revit, or if it's from Revit simply being the wrong type of program for this. It's precisely because of my lack of experience, though, that I can't "see the horizon", so to speak. But I fully admit that this may just be because I'm a total novice with Revit, with only about 100 hours of instruction and 40 hours of practice under my belt. The program reaaaally doesn't feel like it can handle stud-by-stud level detail and modelling, and the Structural side of the program, handling the beams and columns, was oh my god THE clunkiest and most un-intuitive software experience I've had in years. Now, in the end, I was able to produce the construction diagrams you see, but I won't lie, it felt like Revit was fighting me every step of the way. I couldn't figure out how to place slanted beams to form the roof, so I used a truss system instead, though this won't be acceptable for my actual project. In this case, I created a wall family that consists of nothing but two sheathing layers, and then manually placed each stud, and each sill/top plate, using various beams and posts. To practice, I threw together a simple garden shed: It will also allow me to print dimensioned construction drawings of EVERY single wall, floor, and ceiling in the building. But this lengthy and detailed design process will allow me to think things through, and catch mistakes before they show up in the field. Will it take a hell of a long time? Yes absolutely. Instead, I need to design this entire structure stud-by-stud, beam-by-beam, joist-by-joist. Now, I get that most residential buildings in Revit would be designed using the wall, floor, and ceiling tools, producing a sheet package that includes the occasional section/detail view of the walls, but is mostly plan views, with the assumption that the framing team will use their knowledge and experience of HOW something should be built, to "fill in the gaps". As such, I'm cross-posting this to other BIM subs to get their perspectives. The thing is, I don't know if Revit is really the best program for me, or if I'd be better served by something like ArchiCad, Chief Architect, or even Fusion 360. Given that I only have a few years of construction-related experience under the belt, I need to compensate for my lack of experience by having thorough and detailed plans. I am embarking on a project to design a small investment property - a cottage - that I will later build with my own two hands. Rooms can be group‑selected to gather the same information.Hello everyone, and thank you in advance for reading.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |